Amit Shah, India’s Home Minister, has been one of the most influential figures shaping Jammu and Kashmir’s political landscape, especially after the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019. His statements and repeated visits to the region have stirred both hope and controversy among the Kashmiri people.
At Azadi Times, as an independent news platform committed to unbiased journalism and representing Kashmir’s diverse voices, we bring you a detailed overview of Amit Shah’s engagement with Jammu and Kashmir — along with the spectrum of public reactions from across the region.
Amit Shah’s Statements on Jammu and Kashmir
Since becoming India’s Home Minister, Amit Shah has been a key figure behind the government’s policies on Jammu and Kashmir. While he promotes a narrative of integration and development, many Kashmiris and independent observers see these statements in a very different light.
On Article 370: Shah hailed the abrogation of Article 370 as a historic step to end “discrimination” and bring “progress” to the region. However, for many Kashmiris, especially, this move is widely viewed as a deep violation of their constitutional rights, autonomy, and identity. The abrupt removal of special status without local consent has led to prolonged lockdowns, communication blackouts, and a sense of political disenfranchisement. For Jammu Kashmir’s residents, Article 370 was more than just a legal provision; it was a symbol of their unique history and self-determination.
Recomended: Jammu & Kashmir 2024 Election Results | Complete Phase-wise, Party Wise Breakdown – The Azadi Times
Development Promises: Shah often speaks about large investments and infrastructure development bringing peace and prosperity to Jammu and Kashmir. Yet, for many locals, these promises ring hollow in the face of ongoing curfews, restrictions on movement, and an economy battered by years of conflict. The benefits of development remain unevenly distributed, with political instability and heavy militarization undermining genuine growth. Youth unemployment and lack of opportunities continue to fuel frustration and alienation.
Security Focus: Shah’s insistence on a security-heavy approach to combat “terrorism” has led to one of the world’s highest concentrations of armed forces in the region. While the government presents this as necessary to maintain law and order, many Kashmiris experience it as an occupation marked by frequent human rights abuses, extrajudicial killings, and suppression of dissent. The everyday reality of checkpoints, raids, and surveillance has deeply affected social and psychological well-being. Freedom of speech remains heavily curtailed, with journalists facing censorship, harassment, and arrests—resulting in a stifled public discourse and controlled media narratives.
Amit Shah Visits to Jammu and Kashmir: Engagement or Control?
Since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, Amit Shah’s visits to Jammu and Kashmir have drawn significant political attention and media coverage. These trips are officially framed as efforts to promote development and strengthen integration, but they also carry complex symbolic weight in a deeply divided region.
Official Tours and Development Initiatives:
Amit Shah has undertaken multiple visits primarily to inaugurate major infrastructure projects such as strategic tunnels, highways, and enhanced connectivity schemes. These projects are often showcased as milestones in the government’s vision to modernize the region’s economy and reduce its isolation. The official narrative stresses progress and peace, positioning these visits as a commitment to Jammu and Kashmir’s future growth.
Reception Across Regions:
The response to Shah’s visits is mixed and deeply shaped by regional and political contexts. In Jammu city and parts of the Chenab Valley, some locals welcome the attention and hope that increased infrastructure investment will boost the economy, generate jobs, and improve living standards. These areas tend to see the visits as opportunities for development and greater inclusion within the Indian union.
However, in the Kashmir Valley, the political heartland of the region, reactions are far more critical. For many Kashmiris, these visits are perceived not as outreach but as assertions of control by a government seen as heavy-handed and dismissive of Kashmiri aspirations. The extensive security presence, restrictions on movement, and continued political uncertainty fuel feelings of alienation. Many locals view Shah’s visits as symbolic performances designed to legitimize the abrogation of autonomy rather than genuine attempts to engage with the people’s grievances.
Broader Implications:
These contrasting receptions highlight the enduring fault lines in Jammu and Kashmir’s politics and society. While development projects are needed, they cannot substitute for dialogue, respect for human rights, and political solutions that address the underlying causes of conflict. Amit Shah’s visits, therefore, encapsulate the tension between state control and the demand for meaningful engagement—a tension that remains unresolved.
Public Reactions on Amit Shah’s Jammu Kashmr Visits
At The Azadi Times, we understand that Jammu and Kashmir is far from a monolith—it is a complex mosaic of regions and communities, each shaped by unique histories, cultures, and political realities. This diversity is reflected in the wide range of perspectives on the ongoing conflict and governance.
Jammu Region: In Jammu, there is significant support among many residents for the government’s promises of development and improved infrastructure. Many people here hope that better connectivity, investment, and job opportunities will transform the region’s economy and integrate it more fully with the rest of India. However, even within Jammu, concerns remain about maintaining cultural identity and ensuring that local voices are heard in policymaking.
Kashmir Valley: In stark contrast, the Kashmir Valley remains the epicenter of resistance to the revocation of Article 370. The predominant sentiment here is one of loss and political alienation, as many Kashmiris feel their constitutional rights and autonomy were stripped away without their consent. Human rights abuses, prolonged communication blackouts, and restrictions on freedom of expression have only deepened mistrust. Calls for genuine dialogue, respect for Kashmiri identity, and peaceful resolution of grievances are widespread, with many locals demanding an end to militarization and political repression.
Ladakh: Since becoming a separate Union Territory, Ladakh has experienced a mix of optimism and apprehension. Some residents welcome the direct governance from New Delhi, hoping it will bring better services and infrastructure. However, there are also ongoing fears about the erosion of traditional cultures, religious identities, and the need for greater autonomy to protect the unique social fabric of this high-altitude region.
Azad Jammu & Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan: Though administered by Pakistan and outside Indian jurisdiction, these regions watch Jammu and Kashmir closely. Voices from Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan frequently condemn Indian policies, highlighting human rights concerns and the suppression of Kashmiri aspirations. Solidarity with the Kashmiri people and support for their right to self-determination remain central themes in political discourse and public sentiment here.
Amit Shah’s Role and Kashmir’s Future
Amit Shah remains a key figure in the Indian government’s policy toward Jammu and Kashmir. His statements and visits reflect New Delhi’s vision for the region — one centered on integration, security, and development.
However, as Azadi Times reports from the ground, the realities on the ground are complex and contested. The aspirations of the Kashmiri people — across all regions — cannot be reduced to political rhetoric alone.
True peace and progress in Jammu and Kashmir will require inclusive dialogue, respect for rights, and recognition of Kashmir’s unique identity and history.
