Every year on January 5th, Kashmiris in Pakistan and around the world commemorate the day as the “Accession to Pakistan Resolution Day” under the auspices of the UN Security Council. However, this resolution was not passed by the Security Council itself, but by the “Commission for India and Pakistan” which was established by the Security Council.
This distinction is often overlooked, and the day is celebrated by the masses as if it marks the granting of the right to self-determination for Kashmiris by the UN Security Council. While the day and its association with self-determination may seem familiar, the truth behind it is much more nuanced, and it has often been celebrated as a festival without understanding its legal and diplomatic context.
The legal and diplomatic background traces back to India’s complaint to the UN Security Council on January 1, 1948, accusing Pakistan of violating international law by allowing tribal forces to intervene in the state of Jammu and Kashmir on October 22-24, 1947. India argued that Kashmir’s accession to India had been formalized and Pakistan’s involvement in the conflict was a violation of this agreement, urging the Security Council to order Pakistan to withdraw its forces. Pakistan rejected these allegations, asserting that the accession was illegal and that the people of Kashmir were fighting for their independence, with an independent government established in part of the state.
The Security Council, in response, adopted its first resolution on January 17, 1948, calling on both India and Pakistan to take steps to improve the situation and refrain from any actions that would exacerbate the conflict, advising both countries to notify and consult the Security Council regarding any changes in the situation.
In its second resolution, on January 20, 1948, the Security Council created a commission (later known as the UN Commission for India and Pakistan, UNCIP), tasked with visiting the region and working under the authority and instructions of the Security Council to investigate the situation and mediate between the two countries, taking into account the positions presented in India’s complaint and Pakistan’s response.
On February 6, 1948, the Security Council passed its third resolution, stating that the peaceful solution to the dispute, through the process of holding a plebiscite to determine whether the state of Jammu and Kashmir should accede to India or Pakistan, was in the best interests of both India and Pakistan. The resolution also clarified that the plebiscite would occur once hostilities ceased, with both parties withdrawing armed forces, and the people of Kashmir would exercise their right to self-determination through a democratic and peaceful vote.
This resolution outlined principles for ending violence, removing armed personnel, and restoring law and order in the state, with the military tasked with maintaining peace until the plebiscite took place.
The fourth resolution, passed on April 21, 1948, endorsed the previous resolutions, and the Security Council confirmed that both India and Pakistan wanted the issue of Kashmir’s accession to be decided through a free and fair plebiscite. The resolution also increased the size of the Commission to five members and instructed them to proceed to the subcontinent to offer their mediation services to both countries and ensure cooperation in holding the plebiscite.
In its June 3, 1948, resolution, the Security Council instructed the Commission to reach the disputed areas without delay and to report on the issues raised in Pakistan’s letter of January 25, 1948.
On August 13, 1948, the UNCIP passed its first resolution, which included provisions for a ceasefire and principles for a peaceful settlement, as well as consultation on the plebiscite process.
The second and final resolution passed by the Commission on January 5, 1949, is the one that is most celebrated and regarded as the foundation of the right to self-determination for Kashmiris. However, this resolution pertains to the actions undertaken by the Commission in accordance with the earlier resolutions, as the Commission began to implement them.
This resolution outlines the process for holding a plebiscite in Kashmir, emphasizing that the decision on Kashmir’s accession would be made through a democratic, free, and impartial vote once the ceasefire and other conditions outlined in previous resolutions were in place. The UN Secretary-General, in agreement with the Commission, would appoint the Plebiscite Administrator, who would have the necessary authority to ensure the fair conduct of the vote, with the cooperation of the governments of India and Pakistan.
The January 5, 1949 resolution is essentially a procedural document that clarifies the steps required to implement earlier Security Council resolutions, particularly the January 5, 1949, resolution being a mechanism for ensuring the plebiscite takes place under the conditions of peace and fairness.
While Kashmiris celebrate January 5th as “Self-Determination Day,” it is important to understand the legal and diplomatic history behind this day. The resolutions of the UN Security Council, particularly the third resolution of February 6, 1948, are the true foundation of the right to self-determination for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The January 5th, 1949 resolution is not the basis of the plebiscite but rather the procedural framework for its implementation.
Kashmiris, especially students and young people, should take this opportunity to understand the true significance of this day, especially in the context of the international law and diplomatic developments that led to the current situation.
