MUZAFFARABAD: A judicial inquiry report submitted to the Supreme Court of Azad Jammu Kashmir, the High Court, and the Commissioner of Rehabilitation has declared the state subject certificate of Asim Sharif Butt, the region’s Sports Minister, to be fraudulent.
The inquiry, conducted by Deputy Commissioner (Rehabilitation) of Mirpur, concluded that Butt failed to defend the authenticity of his certificate, which is a mandatory legal requirement for holding public office in Azad Kashmir.
Key Details of the Case
The controversy began two months ago when five migrant members of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) Legislative Assembly challenged the validity of Butt’s state subject certificate in the High Court. The court subsequently ordered an inquiry to determine whether the document was genuine. Butt, who represents a constituency reserved for refugees from Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir, faced allegations of residing in Amritsar, India, prior to his political career in Azad Kashmir a claim corroborated by the inquiry report.
Former AJK minister Shaukat Shah, who had previously raised concerns about the case, approached the Supreme Court seeking to suspend the High Court’s order. However, the Supreme Court upheld the directive, leading to the Deputy Commissioner’s investigation. The inquiry confirmed discrepancies in Butt’s documentation, declaring his state subject certificate “fraudulent.”
Political Repercussions
With the report now submitted to judicial authorities, the AJK Legislative Assembly may initiate proceedings to disqualify Butt from his seat. If disqualified, Shaukat Shah, who secured the second-highest votes in the last election, is poised to assume the assembly membership.
What is a State Subject Certificate?
In Jammu Kashmir, a state subject certificate is a legal document proving an individual’s ancestral ties to the region, ensuring their eligibility to own property, vote, or hold public office. The certificate is particularly critical for refugee candidates representing constituencies reserved for those displaced during the 1947 partition and subsequent conflicts.
Broader Implications
This case highlights ongoing concerns about transparency and accountability in Azad Kashmir’s political framework. It also underscores the sensitive nature of refugee representation in the region, where disputes over residency and documentation often intersect with historical grievances tied to the Kashmir conflict.
The AJK Supreme Court and High Court are expected to review the inquiry findings in the coming weeks, with a final ruling likely to set a precedent for similar cases involving eligibility for public office.
