Kashmiri Reactions to Raja Farooq Haider Khan’s Visit to Markets With Firearm

Rawalakot, AJK (Pakistan administered Kashmiri): |In a surprising and controversial move, Raja Muhammad Farooq Haider Khan, former Prime Minister of Pakistan-administered Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and a prominent member of Pakistan’s ruling Muslim League (Nawaz), was filmed visiting various markets in the Jehlum Valley region with a 30 bore pistol strapped to his waist.

This act, which occurred during his visit to welcome Amir Muqam, the Pakistani Minister for Kashmir Affairs, has sparked outrage across the region, triggering debates on the leadership of Kashmir, its relationship with both India and Pakistan, and the future path of the Kashmiri people.

The Incident: A Visit that Divided Public Opinion

Raja Farooq Haider Khan, accompanied by Amir Muqam, a senior figure from Pakistan, visited several markets in the Jehlum Valley, an area under Pakistani administration. The duo’s visit was ostensibly part of a broader effort to engage with locals and demonstrate support for the Kashmiri cause as well as boost morale following rising tensions in the region. However, the firearm carried by the former Prime Minister raised eyebrows.

In a now-viral video, Haider Khan is seen strolling through the market with the weapon visibly strapped to his side, which he later uploaded on social media. His actions have since sparked an outpouring of responses, both in support and in protest. The immediate effect was a growing divide among Kashmiris, with many questioning the appropriateness of carrying a weapon in a public space while engaging with the community.

Public Reaction: Criticism and Calls for Accountability

Rawalakot-based social media platforms exploded with varying opinions following the release of the video. Several Kashmiris expressed shock and dismay, taking to Twitter and Facebook to criticize the gesture. One prominent user wrote:

“How will Kashmir ever achieve freedom if one set of leaders is working under Indian politicians while another group is aligning with Pakistan’s political leaders? This is not leadership; it is a dangerous game. Kashmir is caught in between powers we have no control over. We want peace, not more division.”

Such reactions are part of a larger disillusionment in the region with political leaders, both from India and Pakistan, who are seen as prioritizing their national interests over the aspirations of the Kashmiri people.

One user from the valley, expressing frustration, stated:

“We are Kashmiri people, neither aligned with Modi nor Shahbaz, neither India nor Pakistan. We are caught in the middle, and we want peace. We do not want war, and we do not want our leaders to become pawns of larger geopolitical games. Our struggle is for right to self-determination, not to become the battlefield of others.”

Another commenter, disillusioned by the actions of political figures, said:

“It seems like Raja Farooq Haider Khan will continue to take symbolic actions rather than real ones. Posting videos online and then retreating to his home does not move the cause forward. We need real solutions, not more political theater.”

The Growing Tensions Between India and Pakistan: Kashmir as a Flashpoint

The backdrop of these discussions is the increasingly tense situation between India and Pakistan, especially after the Pellgam attack earlier this month. Both nations have once again become embroiled in heated rhetoric, with Kashmir remaining a central point of contention. The political landscape in Kashmir continues to be marked by instability, especially as cross-border tensions flare up sporadically.

In the aftermath of the Pellgam attack, nationalist Kashmiri leaders have called for an immediate cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. Their voices have emphasized that the people of Kashmir, both in Indian- and Pakistan-administered regions, are the real victims of this ongoing conflict and are pleading for peace.

Leaders such as Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, Yasin Malik, and other pro-independence voices have urged both India and Pakistan to “resolve their issues on their borders and not at the expense of Kashmiris.” They have also called on the international community to play a more active role in de-escalating the situation, urging the global powers to listen to the cries of a people who have endured generations of conflict and suffering.

One prominent figure involved in the independence movement remarked:

“We are not aligned with India or Pakistan. We want a peaceful resolution to our future, based on our right to self-determination. We do not wish to live under the control of any foreign power.”

The Call for a Unified Kashmiri Identity

Raja Farooq Haider Khan’s actions have brought into stark contrast the ongoing struggles for unity and freedom within Kashmir. For many Kashmiris, both in India-administered and Pakistan-administered areas, the primary issue is not political allegiance to India or Pakistan but the struggle for self-determination and the right to establish a future free from external control.

The divide between Kashmiris who feel compelled to follow leaders from both India and Pakistan highlights the larger identity crisis in the region. Many feel they are caught between two larger political entities that continue to disregard the aspirations of the Kashmiri people. This sentiment is growing, as more people are recognizing that they are not simply pawns in the larger geopolitical struggle but individuals with their own rights and future to determine.

The Need for Dialogue, Not War

As the world watches the continued escalation of tensions between India and Pakistan, Kashmiris are pushing for a peaceful resolution to their plight. What many want is not the continuation of a war-like status quo, but an environment where dialogue, mutual respect, and peace prevail.

It is clear that for Kashmir to see lasting peace, it will need independent leadership, not one beholden to foreign governments. Political leaders like Raja Farooq Haider Khan, regardless of their stature, will need to understand that the future of Kashmir rests not on arms or allegiances to foreign powers, but on the collective will of the Kashmiri people.

While the future of Kashmir is still uncertain, the calls for peace, self-determination, and independence are stronger than ever. The people of Kashmir are no longer willing to accept being treated as pawns in the larger power struggles of neighboring countries. They are calling for an end to the bloodshed and for a future where Kashmiris, on both sides of the Line of Control (LoC), can live in peace and with dignity.

Conclusion: A New Era of Kashmiri Leadership?

Raja Farooq Haider Khan’s actions, though controversial, have served as a stark reminder of the fragile political and social landscape in Kashmir. It is crucial that the leaders of the region – especially those who claim to represent the people – take a step back and ask themselves: Are they working for the people of Kashmir, or are they perpetuating the cycle of conflict for their own political gains?

The need of the hour is for leadership that puts Kashmir’s peace and the rights of its people above all else. Kashmiris are not looking for more weapons or more division; they are looking for a future where they can determine their own path, free from the shackles of foreign political agendas.

Only time will tell whether Kashmir’s future will be one of independence, peace, or whether it will continue to be a flashpoint in a larger geopolitical struggle. What is certain, however, is that the voice of the Kashmiri people for peace, justice, and self-determination will continue to grow louder, regardless of the challenges they face.