Azad Kashmir High Court’s Landmark Ruling: Government Banned from Utilizing Development Funds

Muzafarabad: The Azad Kashmir High Court has issued stern directions to the government by approving petitions filed by local municipal representatives. The court has mandated the full implementation of the 1990 Act and imposed a ban on the utilization of development funds through MLAs a move that marks a major victory for municipal governance and transparency in the region.

Local municipal representatives had filed several writ petitions in 2023, challenging the manner in which development funds were being managed. The case was heard by a divisional bench comprising Justices Sardar Ijaz and Khalid Rasheed, who delivered the ruling after considering the submissions of prominent legal advocates Raja Sajad, Barrister Humayun Nawaz, and Raja Nasir.

Key aspects of the decision include:

Also Read

Articles

Significant Reduction in Fire Incidents Across Jammu Kashmir

Sep 10, 2023

• Strict Implementation of the 1990 Act: The ruling compels the government to adhere fully to the provisions of the 1990 Act.
• Ban on Fund Utilization Through MLAs: The government is now barred from channeling development funds via MLAs, ensuring that the funds are managed transparently.
• Empowerment of Municipal Representatives: The court has directed the government to grant municipal representatives their full constitutional powers, enabling them to oversee the transparent allocation and use of public funds.

The decision has been hailed as a major success by municipal representatives, who view it as a critical step toward ensuring accountability in the management of public resources. However, the ruling has elicited varied responses within government circles, with some officials expressing concerns over the implications for current administrative practices.

Legal experts suggest that this landmark ruling could set a precedent for future governance in Azad Kashmir, potentially leading to more responsible fiscal management and enhanced local autonomy. The case continues to be closely monitored by both political analysts and the public, as its broader implications for the region’s administrative framework are unfolding.