Muzaffarabad: Pakistan-administered Jammu & Kashmir appears to be heading toward another phase of political uncertainty and mass disruption, as the Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) has issued a fresh warning of protests and a possible region-wide shutdown, citing what it calls the failure of the Pakistani government to honor commitments made after the historic September 29 protest.
According to The Azadi Times, tensions have resurfaced across the territory as talks between Islamabad and the JKJAAC have collapsed, with the committee refusing to engage in further negotiations. Activists have once again begun circulating the slogan “Bandh Matlab Bandh” (Shutdown means Shutdown) across social media platforms, signaling preparations for renewed civil resistance.
Background: The September 29 Uprising
On September 29, 2025, Pakistan-administered Jammu & Kashmir witnessed one of the largest popular mobilizations in its recent history. Protesters from all districts of the territory poured into the streets, bringing daily life to a standstill for nearly five consecutive days. Markets remained closed, transport halted, and government offices ceased functioning.
The protests were organized under the banner of the Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee, a coalition of traders’ unions, transport associations, civil society groups, and grassroots political activists.
During the demonstrations, dozens of protesters were reportedly arrested, hundreds sustained injuries, and clashes between security forces and demonstrators were documented in multiple districts. The shutdown eventually ended only after negotiations between the JKJAAC leadership and the Pakistani federal authorities, which resulted in what was described at the time as a “mutually agreed settlement.”
The 38-Point Charter of Demands
At the core of the movement was a 38-point Charter of Demands, addressing long-standing political, economic, and governance-related grievances in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. These included issues related to subsidies, electricity pricing, taxation, governance autonomy, and political representation.
One of the most controversial demands concerned the abolition of 12 so-called “migrant seats” in the Azad Jammu & Kashmir Legislative Assembly.
These seats are allocated to individuals originally from Indian-administered Jammu & Kashmir who migrated to Pakistan during the upheavals of the 1980s and 1990s and now permanently reside in different parts of Pakistan. While the government officially refers to them as “migrants,” critics argue that their political representation in the AJK Assembly distorts local democratic processes.
The JKJAAC maintains that these seats enable non-resident actors to influence decision-making in a territory where they do not live, pay taxes, or face the daily realities experienced by residents of Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The committee has repeatedly alleged that these seats are used by mainstream Pakistani political parties to manipulate regional politics.
Allegations of Broken Promises
Months after the September agreement, the JKJAAC now claims that either no meaningful progress has been made on the majority of demands or that implementation has been symbolic and ineffective.
Committee representatives argue that the issue of the 12 migrant seats remains unresolved, subsidies have not been restored in real terms, and structural reforms promised during negotiations have failed to materialize.
More alarmingly, the JKJAAC has accused Pakistani authorities of launching a post-protest crackdown. According to the committee, several of its leaders and activists have been placed on the Exit Control List and the Passport Control List, restricting their freedom of movement.
In addition, the committee alleges that criminal cases are being registered against activists in multiple districts, a move it describes as an attempt to intimidate and dismantle the movement through legal pressure.
The Pakistani government has not publicly responded in detail to these allegations.
Refusal to Resume Talks
In a significant escalation, the JKJAAC has now formally announced its refusal to participate in any further negotiations with Islamabad, stating that previous talks were used merely to defuse public pressure without addressing core issues.
“The trust deficit has widened,” a senior committee member told The Azadi Times on condition of anonymity. “We suspended our movement in good faith. What followed were delays, half-measures, and repression.”
This breakdown has fueled speculation that a renewed shutdown could be larger and more confrontational than the September protests.
Rising Public Anxiety
Across Pakistan-administered Kashmir, uncertainty is growing. Traders fear economic losses, transporters worry about prolonged closures, and families recall the injuries and arrests of the previous movement.
Yet, there is also visible public sympathy for the committee’s stance. Many residents argue that systemic issues—particularly rising living costs and perceived political disenfranchisement—leave them with few options other than collective protest.
Social media platforms are once again filled with protest slogans, archived footage from September, and calls for unity across districts.
A Test for Governance in Pakistan-Administered Kashmir
The unfolding situation presents a serious challenge for governance in Pakistan-administered Jammu & Kashmir. Analysts warn that ignoring popular movements or relying on coercive measures could deepen alienation and destabilize an already sensitive region.
For Islamabad, the crisis is not merely administrative but political. Pakistan-administered Kashmir has long been presented as a democratic counter-narrative to Indian-administered Kashmir. Sustained unrest, critics argue, risks undermining that claim on international platforms.
As of now, the region stands at a crossroads: whether authorities choose renewed dialogue grounded in concrete action, or whether the territory moves toward another prolonged shutdown remains to be seen.
What is certain is that the slogan echoing across digital spaces—“Bandh Matlab Bandh”—signals that patience among large sections of the population is wearing thin.











