Home Blog Page 3

Heavy Shelling Reported on Protesters in Rawalakot

Heavy Shelling Reported on Protesters in Rawalakot

Rawalakot: According to local sources, police and Rangers carried out intense tear gas shelling on protesters during a demonstration in Rawalakot, resulting in reports of multiple individuals being affected. Tensions remain high in the area as the situation continues to develop.

Eyewitnesses stated that protesters were gathered to voice their demands when clashes and heightened tensions emerged between demonstrators and security personnel. Authorities reportedly used tear gas to disperse the crowd, causing breathing difficulties and distress among participants.

Local reports indicate that a large number of protesters dispersed following the shelling, although demonstrations have not completely ceased. Several community and political figures have criticized the use of force, arguing that it undermines citizens’ right to peaceful protest.

As of the time of reporting, no official statement has been issued by the relevant authorities regarding the incident. Residents and political observers continue to closely monitor developments in the region.

Azadi Times is following the situation and will provide updates as more information becomes available.

Meta Description:
Intense tear gas shelling by police and Rangers reported during protests in Rawalakot, with multiple people affected and tensions remaining high.

Tags:
Rawalakot, Azad Kashmir, Protest, Police, Rangers, Tear Gas Shelling, Human Rights, Azadi Times

All Parties Conference in Muzaffarabad: Resolution Passes on Timely Elections, Defers Constitutional Reforms on Refugee Seats to Assembly

Muzaffarabad, Pakistan-administered Kashmir – In a significant political development, an All Parties Conference (APC) convened in the capital has unanimously passed a resolution reaffirming the right to self-determination for the people of Kashmir, while mandating that general elections be held on time and leaving the complex issue of constitutional amendments regarding refugee seats to the legislative assembly.

Chaired by Prime Minister Faisal Mumtaz Rathore at the Prime Minister’s House, the conference saw the attendance of top political and religious leadership, including four former prime ministers and the Leader of the Opposition. A joint declaration issued after the meeting outlined a broad consensus on domestic political stability and the Kashmir dispute.

According to the official communiqué, participants reiterated their full support for the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination in accordance with United Nations Security Council resolutions. The leaders described the ongoing democratic and constitutional process in Pakistan-administered Kashmir as the foundation of the region’s stability, pledging to further strengthen democratic institutions.

Key Resolutions: Elections and Institutional Supremacy

The resolution enshrined a firm commitment to holding the next general elections for the Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) Legislative Assembly strictly within the constitutionally mandated timeframe. The leadership vowed to take all necessary measures to ensure that the polls are conducted in a “free, fair, transparent, and peaceful” manner. The declaration further stated that any attempt to interfere in the electoral process would be legally countered.

The 12 Refugee Seats: Assembly to Decide
Addressing the historically contentious issue of the 12 seats reserved for Kashmiri refugees settled in Pakistan, the conference acknowledged this representation as both a “historic and constitutional reality.” However, recognizing the legal complexities surrounding the current electoral system for these seats, the APC refrained from making an executive decision.

The declaration firmly stated that the power to enact constitutional amendments lies exclusively with the elected representatives in the Legislative Assembly. The gathering recommended that before any potential constitutional changes are initiated, a broad-based consultative process be launched, involving political parties, bar associations, civil society, and constitutional experts.

The communiqué also emphasized that promoting tolerance, dialogue, and peaceful political struggle is essential for sustainable peace in the region.

It is pertinent to note that while major stakeholders participated, the Jammu and Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) declined to attend the All Parties Conference.

Deadlock Persists: JKJAAC Announces Wheel Jam and Shutter Down Strike on June 9 as Talks with Government Fail

Muzaffarabad, Pakistan Administered Kashmir — Negotiations between the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) and a high-powered Pakistani government committee ended in stalemate late Saturday, with the protest group reaffirming its call for a statewide wheel jam and shutter down strike on June 9, alongside a long march.

The marathon talks, held at a private hotel in Muzaffarabad, stretched late into the night but failed to produce a breakthrough on the contentious issue of twelve reserved seats for Kashmiri refugees in the Legislative Assembly — a demand that has emerged as the focal point of the ongoing political standoff.

Talks Collapse, Protest Call Stands

In a brief statement issued after the negotiations concluded, JKJAAC core member Shoukat Nawaz Mir declared the talks a failure.

“The negotiations between the high-powered committee and the Awami Action Committee have failed. Consequently, a long march will be held on June 9,” Mir announced. He appealed to the people across the territory to prepare for the long march, while adding that “all sincere efforts from the Pakistani government will be welcomed.”

Despite requests from representatives of both the Pakistani government and Pakistan Administered Kashmir government to postpone the June 9 protest, the JKJAAC decided to maintain its agitation schedule. The committee urged the public to intensify preparations for the long march.

Government: Talks Not Over, Next Round Expected

Contradicting the JKJAAC’s characterization, Pakistani government representative and Advisor to the Prime Minister Rana Sanaullah insisted that the negotiations were not concluded.

“Talks have not ended. We will meet again next week,” Sanaullah told the media. He revealed that both sides had exchanged proposals during the session, and that the Pakistan Administered Kashmir government would convene an All Parties Conference (APC) to build consensus among all stakeholders.

According to Sanaullah, the next meeting is expected to take place by June 6 or 7. He also clarified that elections in Pakistan Administered Kashmir would proceed as constitutionally scheduled, with efforts underway to resolve outstanding issues before the election timetable is announced.

On the refugee seats controversy, Sanaullah remained non-committal, stating that “a decision on this matter will be made at the All Parties Conference. At this stage, I cannot say anything definitive from my side.”

The Refugee Seats Dispute: Constitutional Amendment Required

The most divisive issue on the table remains the future of twelve seats in the Legislative Assembly reserved for Kashmiri refugees residing in various parts of Pakistan. The JKJAAC has demanded their abolition, arguing that the arrangement undermines local representation.

Pakistani Minister for Kashmir Affairs Amir Muqam has maintained that immediate action is impossible, as any change requires a constitutional amendment in the Pakistan Administered Kashmir Assembly — a process demanding a two-thirds majority, or support from at least 35 members.

“No bill has been presented in the Assembly on this matter so far, indicating that the legal process has not even reached its initial stages,” Muqam noted.

However, JKJAAC leader Shoukat Nawaz Mir has claimed that the required political support for the amendment already exists. He argued that even if refugee seat representatives do not vote in favor, the necessary majority can still be secured. Citing a precedent, he pointed to a previous Prime Ministerial election where 48 members cast their votes, suggesting that broad political backing can be mobilized on critical occasions.

Political observers interpret this assertion as an indication that the JKJAAC may have received behind-the-scenes assurances that progress on the issue is achievable.

Background: The October 4, 2025 Agreement

The current deadlock centers on the implementation of an agreement reached on October 4, 2025, which the JKJAAC claims has been met with governmental delays and obstructions. Saturday’s talks reportedly saw discussions on various proposals related to this agreement, though no consensus emerged.

Election Context Adds Urgency

The negotiations are taking place against the backdrop of anticipated general elections in Pakistan Administered Kashmir, widely expected to be held in July 2026, though the Election Commission has yet to announce an official schedule.

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has already announced its candidates, accelerating political activity across the territory. The JKJAAC has set a deadline of May 31 for the acceptance of its demands, warning of further measures if its calls go unheeded.

What’s Next

With the JKJAAC maintaining its June 9 protest call and the Pakistani government planning an APC and follow-up talks within the first week of June, the coming days will be critical in determining whether a negotiated settlement can be reached — or whether the territory heads toward heightened political confrontation on the streets of Muzaffarabad and beyond.

Eid-ul-Adha 2026: Prayer Announced at Historic Eidgah Srinagar, Mirwaiz Reviews Arrangements

SRINAGAR, INDIAN ADMINISTERED KASHMIR — The management of Anjuman Auqaf Jama Masjid Srinagar has officially announced that the Eid-ul-Adha (Feast of Sacrifice) prayers will be offered at the historic Eidgah Srinagar on Wednesday, May 27, 2026, at 9:30 AM sharp, subject to weather conditions.

The decision was made during a meeting of the Executive Body chaired by the President of Anjuman Auqaf and Mirwaiz of Kashmir, Dr. Moulvi Muhammad Umar Farooq, at the Central Office of Jama Masjid Srinagar today. With millions of people expected to search for the final schedule, the Anjuman has urged civil authorities to ensure a hassle-free congregation.

Arrangements Reviewed by Mirwaiz on Ground

Ahead of the mass gathering, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq personally visited the Eidgah ground to inspect the facilities and on-ground realities. He expressed satisfaction with the condition of the field, noting that the construction of the new Mihrab (Prayer Niche) and Minbar (Pulpit) has been completed successfully.

“The ground is in excellent shape. If the weather remains favorable, the Eid prayer can be performed smoothly in the open field, following the Sunnah of the Prophet (PBUH),” the Mirwaiz observed during his inspection.

Event Schedule for May 27

The Anjuman has also released a pre-prayer schedule for the benefit of devotees:

· 8:30 AM (IST): Special Sermon by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq on the philosophy of sacrifice, highlighting the spirit of obedience to Allah, compassion, and the essence of Qurbani.
· 9:30 AM (IST): Eid-ul-Adha congregational prayers.

“Hope Administration Won’t Create Hurdles”

In a strongly worded yet hopeful message, the Auqaf management expressed optimism that the local administration will not impose last-minute restrictions at the Eidgah. The body lamented a recurring trend where worshippers are kept in suspense until the final moments, only for authorities to deny permission for prayers at both the Eidgah and the historic Jama Masjid.

The Anjuman stated, “There is no justification for imposing restrictions or bans. The field is ready, the Mihrab is complete, and the community wishes to pray in peace. Hurting the religious sentiments of the masses through late-night disruptions is a violation of religious freedom.”

Contingency Plan for Bad Weather

The Anjuman clarified a backup plan for inclement weather. Should it rain, the Eid prayers will be shifted to the Historic Jama Masjid Srinagar, maintaining the same 9:30 AM timing and organizational structure.

 

AJK Government Notifies Three-Day Public Holiday for Eid-ul-Adha 2026

MUZAFFARABAD, Azad Jammu and Kashmir — The Government of Azad Jammu and Kashmir has officially announced public holidays for Eid-ul-Adha 2026, issuing a formal notification for a three-day break across the state.

According to the official notification released by the administration, citizens of Azad Jammu and Kashmir will observe public holidays starting from May 26, 2026 . The holidays will run for three consecutive days, covering May 26, 27, and 28 .

During this period, all government and private schools, colleges, and offices will remain completely closed. The announcement aims to allow citizens to fully observe the religious festival of sacrifice with their families.

In a related development, the Mirpur administration has also issued a separate notification fixing the wages of butchers for Eid-ul-Adha, a move intended to protect citizens from overcharging during the busy sacrificial season.

The notification has been circulated to all relevant departments across the ten districts of Azad Jammu and Kashmir to ensure uniform compliance.

Eid-ul-Adha, one of the two major Islamic festivals, commemorates the willingness of Prophet Ibrahim to sacrifice his son as an act of obedience to God. The festival is marked by congregational prayers, the sacrifice of animals, and the distribution of meat among family, neighbours, and the less fortunate.

For official reference, citizens are advised to consult the formal notification issued by the Services and General Administration Department (S&GAD) of Azad Jammu and Kashmir.

Eid Eve Horror in Muzaffarabad: Driver Drives Coaster into Jhelum River After Alleged Assault by Traffic Police; Protests Erupt

MUZAFFARABAD, Pakistan administered Kashmir — On the eve of Eid-ul-Fitr, a public transport driver in Muzaffarabad, the capital of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, drove his passenger coaster into the Jhelum River in an apparent act of desperation after an altercation with traffic police—an incident that has sparked angry protests across the city.

What Happened

The coaster, operating on the Rawalpindi-Muzaffarabad route, was stopped at Chhattar Chowk by Muzaffarabad Traffic Police over a route permit violation. Officials demanded documents and imposed a PKR 5,000 fine.

According to eyewitness accounts and preliminary reports, the driver pleaded emotionally with the officers, saying he now faced a choice between paying the penalty or buying Eid gifts for his children. A verbal argument ensued. Police confiscated the vehicle’s documents but allowed the driver to first drop his passengers at the main bus terminal, on the condition that he return immediately.

Upon his return to Chhattar Chowk, the situation escalated. Police ordered an official to escort the coaster to the police station. It is alleged that during this process, the traffic official slapped and physically mistreated the driver.

The Plunge

In a moment of extreme emotional distress, the driver sped the vehicle toward the riverbank, directly in front of the Supreme Court VIP gate, and drove it into the Jhelum River. The traffic police official inside the vehicle narrowly escaped by jumping out moments before impact. The driver also leaped from the vehicle but sustained injuries.

Rescue 1122 Muzaffarabad teams responded quickly, pulling the injured driver from the river and transferring him to the Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Muzaffarabad for medical treatment.

Public Outrage and Protests

News of the incident spread rapidly, triggering strong public condemnation. Large crowds gathered at Chhattar Chowk and surrounding areas, protesting what they describe as routine harassment and heavy-handed tactics by traffic police. The protests continued late into the night, with demonstrators demanding accountability and a formal inquiry into the conduct of the officials involved.

Context for Readers

Muzaffarabad serves as the capital of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), the territory administered by Pakistan, and sits at the confluence of the Neelum and Jhelum rivers. The region, claimed by both Pakistan and India, has been at the centre of the decades-old Kashmir conflict. While politically sensitive, cities like Muzaffarabad also experience the everyday governance and policing challenges seen across South Asia—where power imbalances between state officials and working-class citizens often lead to tragic outcomes.

What Comes Next

No official statement has yet been issued by the Muzaffarabad Traffic Police or the AJK administration. However, public pressure is mounting for a transparent investigation into both the route permit dispute and the alleged physical assault that preceded the driver’s desperate act.

This is a developing story. Updates will follow as more information becomes available.

Prince Rahim Aga Khan Concludes Historic Three-Day Visit to Gilgit-Baltistan and Chitral

GILGIT, Pakistan-Administered Kashmir – Prince Rahim Al-Hussaini Aga Khan, the spiritual leader of the Ismaili community, departed from Gilgit today after completing a historic three-day visit to Gilgit-Baltistan (Pakistan-administered Kashmir) and Chitral.

During the visit, Prince Rahim attended various religious and social gatherings in Hunza, Gojal, Gahkuch, Ghizer, Gilgit, and Chitral. Millions of devoted followers gathered to catch a glimpse of their spiritual leader, an event they consider a great blessing.

The visit was marked by an extraordinary atmosphere of joy, devotion, and religious unity across Gilgit-Baltistan. Large crowds turned out to welcome their spiritual guide, reflecting the deep bond between the community and its leadership.

At the conclusion of the visit, a formal farewell ceremony was held at the helipad in Gilgit. The Acting Chief Minister and Governor of Gilgit-Baltistan, along with senior civil and military officials, were present to see him off.

Before his departure, Prince Rahim Aga Khan thanked the civil and military institutions for their assistance. He praised the security arrangements and other logistical measures taken during the tour, expressing his gratitude to all those who contributed to the smooth conduct of the visit.

The visit is being seen as historically significant for the Ismaili community in the strategically located region of Gilgit-Baltistan, which has been under Pakistani administration since 1947.

Digital Iron Curtain in Kashmir: India Blocks Dozens of Facebook Accounts, Including The Azadi Times Founder Atif MaqboolDigital Iron Curtain in Kashmir: India Blocks Dozens of Facebook Accounts, Including The Azadi Times Founder Atif Maqbool

SRINAGAR/MUZAFFARABAD — In a sweeping new wave of digital censorship, Indian authorities have orchestrated the blocking of multiple Facebook accounts operated from Pakistan-administered Kashmir, dealing a severe blow to the already fragile cross-LoC communication lifeline for divided Kashmiri families. Among the prominent voices silenced is Atif Maqbool, founder and ex editor of The Azadi Times, the Jammu Kshmir’s only independent international news platform.

Several prominent digital activists, citizen journalists, and grassroots organizers from both sides of the Line of Control received stark notifications from Meta, the parent company of Facebook. The message was uniform and chilling: their accounts were being “restricted in India” due to a direct “legal request” from Indian government agencies.

The latest casualty list goes beyond Maqbool and includes high-profile names such as Nosheen Khawaja, a vocal human rights advocate, and an account operating under the regional moniker “District Kotli,” which served as a critical bridge sharing cultural and familial updates between the divided territories. Sources confirm that numerous smaller accounts, which played a vital role in connecting local communities, were also terminated without detailed public justification.

For Kashmiris, these platforms are not just social media; they are a digital lifeline. With physical movement across the heavily militarized LoC virtually impossible, Facebook and WhatsApp have for years served as the only “virtual J&K,” where separated cousins could meet, political opinions could be whispered, and a shared cultural identity could survive the barbed wire.

The Story of a Silenced Bridge

Atif Maqbool, who also serves as a member of the Jammu and Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC), took to X (formerly Twitter) to break the news of his own digital incarceration. In a post that resonated with the collective pain of a partitioned nation, Maqbool did not just announce a ban; he narrated a tragedy of human connection being severed.

He wrote: “On the ground, we are already prisoners in our own homeland, but now they are erecting borders on the internet as well. This is a violation of basic human rights. The people of Pakistan-administered Kashmir and India-administered Kashmir share relatives, political ideologies, culture, and grief. We only shared this pain through social media. Now, they have locked that door too.”

His statement paints a vivid picture of the cruel dichotomy of the Kashmir conflict. While the world discusses geopolitics, ordinary families who have not embraced in seven decades relied on a pixelated video call to mourn deaths and celebrate births. The blocking of the “District Kotli” account, for instance, effectively silences an entire region’s digital identity, erasing the daily narratives of life in that district from the view of their brethren across the divide.

The Weaponization of Legal Requests

This is not an isolated incident of a tech company enforcing community guidelines. This is a geopolitical act executed through legal channels. By pressuring Meta via “legal requests,” India is effectively extending its territorial censorship laws beyond the Line of Control, imposing its digital jurisdiction on the residents of Pakistan-administered Kashmir.

Maqbool’s robust voice, amplified through The Azadi Times, has consistently focused on human rights documentation and the right to self-determination. The blocking suggests an intolerance for independent Kashmiri journalism that refuses to be a mouthpiece for state narratives. It exposes a digital “Iron Curtain” descending over South Asia, where algorithms are weaponized to enforce a narrative and isolate a people.

“The World Must Answer for This Tyranny”

In his poignant message, Maqbool did not appeal to governments but to the global conscience. “The world will have to answer for this oppression. History will never forgive this silence,” he stated, echoing the sentiment of a generation of Kashmiris who feel abandoned by international human rights mechanisms.

It is an attempt to crush a platform that was born to break silences. Yet, the act of silencing itself becomes a testament to the power of the truth being spoken. As Maqbool and his colleagues face this new digital imprisonment, the question lingers in the cold mountain air of the Himalayas: Can you truly disconnect a heart from its homeland, even if you unplug the router?

The Azadi Times continues to monitor this developing situation and stands resilient in its mission to report the unfiltered truth of Jammu and Kashmir. We refuse to be silenced.

Broken promises and a long march: Kashmir’s unresolved 38-point charter

The lights went out in the conference hall just as a Pakistani federal minister began listing successes in improving the electricity supply. That unintended moment of darkness during a press conference in Muzaffarabad on Monday may have been a coincidence, but for many Kashmiris watching, it told a bigger story. Hours of talks between the Pakistan-backed Azad Jammu & Kashmir (AJK) government and the Joint Public Action Committee ended without a breakthrough, leaving a four-month-old agreement unfulfilled and a region once again on the edge of political confrontation.

On 4 October 2025, the Government of Pakistan, the AJK administration, and the Joint Public Action Committee signed a 38-point Charter of Demands. The agreement was meant to address longstanding grievances of AJK residents, including electoral reforms, power sector improvements, health card restoration, banking services, and the rights of migrants settled in Pakistan.

Under the deal, implementation was supposed to begin by January 2026. But according to committee members, May is now passing with little more than announcements and newly formed committees. The Action Committee has already announced a province-wide wheel jam, shutter-down strike, a long march from Bhimber to Muzaffarabad, and a siege of the assembly on 9 June.

On 11 May, federal ministers Engr. Amir Maqam and Tariq Fazal Chaudhry met AJK government ministers Qasim Majeed and Dewan Ali Khan Chughtai with Action Committee representatives Choudhry Imtiaz Aslam, Umar Nazeer Kashmiri, and Shaukat Nawaz Mir in Muzaffarabad.

According to sources familiar with the meeting, the most difficult discussions centred on twelve reserved seats for migrants from Pakistan, legal cases related to firing during a previous protest march, electricity infrastructure, the health card scheme, the Bank of AJK’s status, and the Kohori Tunnel project.

Speaking to journalists afterwards, Engr. Amir Maqam said progress had been made on most demands and several points were in final implementation stages. He confirmed that a constitutional committee would meet in Islamabad on 14 May to discuss the twelve migrant seats, and invited the Action Committee to participate. “Protests and strikes are not solutions,” he said. “Given current regional and international conditions, this region cannot afford a new confrontation.”

Within hours, the Action Committee’s core members rejected the government’s account.

“They have broken their promise on the 4 October agreement,” Umar Nazir Kashmiri told reporters at the Central Press Club in Muzaffarabad. “Every issue is met with delaying tactics. No clear timeline for implementation has been given.”

Shaukat Nawaz Mir challenged the government to produce a single PC-One or DWP document for any completed project. “Not one rupee has been paid to the insurance company for the health card scheme since January. The treatment system is effectively paralysed,” he said.

He also raised concerns about the Kohori Tunnel project, a critical route where landslides have repeatedly claimed lives. “Saudi funding is available, but now the government says a tunnel is not possible in this mountainous area. Yet the Neelum-Jhelum project tunnel was built in the same region. We fear the funds are being diverted elsewhere.”

On electricity, he stated that while Pakistan allocated 10 billion rupees for AJK’s power network improvement, the PC-One had not even been prepared since October.

The meeting also addressed legal cases arising from a previous public march. According to government representatives, several FIRs against Action Committee members have been closed, but approximately 15 cases remain pending in courts. The Action Committee argues that individuals named in cases involving firing on unarmed protesters should not be allowed to contest elections.

The government has given assurances that the constitutional committee meeting on 14 May will offer a platform to debate the twelve migrant seats. Federal Minister Amir Maqam said the committee could examine how removing or retaining those seats might affect the broader Kashmir political question.

The 11 May talks in Muzaffarabad ended without a final resolution. The government appears to be using negotiations and committees to keep the situation under control. The Joint Public Action Committee, however, shows no sign of backing down and says it remains ready to mobilise.

All eyes are now on two dates: 14 May, when the constitutional committee meets in Islamabad, and 31 May, the Action Committee’s self-imposed deadline for tangible progress. If no major breakthrough comes by then, the 9 June call for a long march and assembly siege could mark the beginning of a new and potentially turbulent phase in AJK’s political landscape.

Kashmir’s Bloody Betrayal: Minister Shakes Hands With Accused Killer

The streets of Muzaffarabad still remember. On 29 September, as the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC) led protests demanding rights and reform, violence erupted. Those who had taken to the streets seeking justice were met with bullets. Their only crime was that they were Kashmiris demanding their rights.
 
The toll was devastating. In the aftermath, homes across Pakistan-administered Kashmir were plunged into mourning. Fathers did not return. Children were left orphaned. The streets that had echoed with calls for justice fell silent under the weight of grief and gunpowder.
 
In the wake of the violence, Islamabad moved to negotiate. Amir Muqam, representing federal (Pakistani) interests, sat at the table with the Action Committee. The talks yielded an agreement—a peace deal meant to address grievances and chart a path forward. The committee expressed hope; the government promised change.
Yet beneath the formal handshakes, a more complex reality was unfolding.
 
It was what happened next—away from the cameras and the formal protocol—that ignited fresh outrage. According to widespread local accounts, Amir Muqam, the same Pakistani federal minister who had negotiated with the Jammu Kashmir Joint Action Committee, subsequently visited the residence of the individual accused of firing on protesters on 29 September. The figure in question had allegedly opened fire on unarmed Kashmiris, yet now received a ministerial visit while victims’ families still awaited justice.
 
For the Action Committee and its supporters, the visit represented more than a political misstep—it symbolized a profound moral failure. Here was a government negotiator, ostensibly mediating to address the grievances of slain protesters, extending courtesy to a figure linked to the very violence that had claimed Kashmiri lives.
 
The optics were devastating. “Talks by day, betrayal by night,” became the refrain circulating across local discourse. Activists argued that if individuals implicated in protester deaths could receive ministerial visits, then the negotiation process itself was exposed as hollow—a temporary measure to pacify public anger while the underlying power structures remained intact.
 
The controversy cuts to the heart of a deeper crisis in Pakistan-administered Kashmir: the question of who truly speaks for the Kashmiri people.
When a federal minister engages with protest leaders while simultaneously courting figures linked to violence against those same protesters, it reinforces a pervasive local belief: that the political elite serves multiple masters, balancing public pacification with private allegiances to power. The accusation is not merely of political opportunism, but of moral duplicity—of treating Kashmiri blood as a negotiable commodity in a larger game of patronage.
 
The person accused of firing on the people has reportedly joined the Pakistan Muslim League-N without fear or consequence. No accountability, no inquiry, no shame. This has led many to question: Was this the promised accountability? Was this the pledge of justice?
When an accused can join a ruling party, then talking of negotiations becomes outright deception. It proves, critics argue, that the Action Committee talks were merely a drama—a political performance to cool public anger while the real game continued behind closed doors.
 
For the families of those who perished on 29 September, justice remains elusive. No senior official has been held accountable for the deaths. No transparent investigation has yielded visible results. The figures accused of involvement in the violence remain politically active, navigating the territory’s landscape with apparent impunity.
 
This pattern—where violence against Kashmiri protesters results in neither accountability nor ostracism—fuels a growing conviction among activists that the state protects its own while dispensing platitudes to the governed.
 
In Pakistan-administered Kashmir, governance has long been criticized as a facade of local autonomy over a reality of external control. In this context, the negotiations and their aftermath fit a familiar pattern: crisis, followed by cosmetic concession, followed by normalization without structural change.
 
The visit by Amir Muqam—if confirmed in its details—would not be an aberration but a revelation: a glimpse behind the curtain at how power actually operates, where the architects of violence and the brokers of peace share the same spaces, and where Kashmiri lives are weighed against political expediency.
 
The streets of Muzaffarabad are quiet now, but the silence is uneasy. The Action Committee has made its position clear: such duplicitous and hypocritical actions are utterly rejected. They declare that Kashmiri blood is not cheap.
 
The question that haunts the valleys is whether justice is possible within a framework that denies genuine self-determination. When negotiators shake hands with both the victims and the accused, when the blood of protesters becomes a footnote in political calculations, the answer seems foreordained.
 
Until structural contradictions are addressed—until Kashmiris can genuinely chart their own political future without interference, until accountability replaces impunity—the cycle will repeat. The talks will come, the promises will be made, and the betrayals, subtle or overt, will follow.
 
And in the homes where fathers did not return, where children ask why their brothers never came home, the wait for justice will continue—measured not in diplomatic timelines, but in the enduring grief of a people who have learned that in the politics of this disputed land, blood is cheaper than power.