23.5 C
Los Angeles
Tuesday, September 29, 2026

Sajjad Lone Warns J&K Speaker Over Lawmaker Privilege Violations

Peoples Conference chief Sajjad Lone tells the...

Shaukat Nawaz Mir Case: Court Sets October 6 for Next Hearing

Legal teams representing the prominent Joint Awami Action Committee leader appeared before the court as proceedings were adjourned to next month. MUZAFFARABAD — The court has set October 6 as the next date of hearing in the ongoing legal proceedings involving Shaukat Nawaz Mir, a prominent leader of the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee. […]

AJK High Court Admits Petition Against Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee

KashmirPoliticsAJK High Court Admits Petition Against Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee

Muzaffarabad | Pak-administered Kashmir — The Azad Jammu and Kashmir High Court has admitted a petition challenging the activities of the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC), with petitioners calling the organization “an unlawful group” whose protests and strikes have increasingly disrupted public life across the region.

The petition, filed by Sardar Imran Hussain, Sardar Ahsan, and Muneer Riaz through Advocate Sardar Bilal Shakeel, argues that JKJAAC’s repeated calls for shutdowns and demonstrations have deprived ordinary citizens of their fundamental rights and posed a threat to public order.

In particular, the petition cited the sudden lockdown on August 30, 2025, which brought daily life to a standstill, creating severe difficulties for residents and businesses. Petitioners also pointed to JKJAAC’s announcement of another planned lockdown on September 29, 2025, made via social media, describing it as both “illegal and harmful to civic stability.”

The filing further alleges that state institutions have been unable or unwilling to act against the committee, leaving the public exposed to recurring disruptions. “It is now the responsibility of the judiciary to safeguard citizens and restrain such unlawful activities,” the petitioners maintained.

After hearing the preliminary arguments, the High Court has issued notices to 30 respondents, directing them to respond to the allegations. The case is expected to set the stage for a legal debate over the balance between political activism, public safety, and citizens’ rights in Azad Kashmir.

Check out our other content

Most Popular Articles